Лорд Монктон, бывший советник премьер-министра Тэтчер по науке, распространяет ужасные слухи о реальных целях и задачах глобального потепления. Мол, договор, который Обама подпишет в Копенгагене, предусматривает создание мирового правительства, которое будет перераспределять средства от богатых стран к бедным, попутно наращивая прочие правительственные возможности.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
Он там все валит на коммунистов, хлынувших из-за поваленной берлинской стены. По-моему, зря: нет там никаких коммунистов. Такие вещи и без коммунистов находят немало сторонников.
Паника, которую сеет Монктон, неплохо сочетается с рассказами Коулмана про то, что вся эта история затеяна в шестидесятых ооновским бюрократом, мечтавшим о всемирном правительстве.
Back in the 1960s, this global warming research came to the attention of a Canadian born United Nation’s bureaucrat named Maurice Strong. He was looking for issues he could use to fulfill his dream of one-world government. Strong organized a World Earth Day event in Stockholm, Sweden in 1970. From this he developed a committee of scientists, environmentalists and political operatives from the UN to continue a series of meetings.
Strong developed the concept that the UN could demand payments from the advanced nations for the climatic damage from their burning of fossil fuels to benefit the underdeveloped nations—a sort of CO2 tax that would be the funding for his one-world government. But he needed more scientific evidence to support his primary thesis. So Strong championed the establishment of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC). This was not a pure, “climate study” scientific organization, as we have been led to believe. It was an organization of one-world government UN bureaucrats, environmental activists and environmentalist scientists who craved UN funding so they could produce the science they needed to stop the burning of fossil fuels.
Несколько смахивает на конспирологию, но момент истины уже близок: посмотрим, что привезет нам Обама из Копенгагена.
Опубликовано в Записках Часовщика. Комментировать лучше там, но можно и здесь.